Vegas Roulette

[Rachel Reilly]

Hey guys congrats on the final 2!

Anyways just a little opening statement from mee.

Ivette, me and you were aligned since week 1, it sucks that you had vacation and looked inactive right after that, but gurl you sho nuff is a competitor and I luff you!

James, I lost A LOT of respect for you since you lied to me about your vote, I seriously..like was getting evicted no matter what, yet you decided to lie and be like "yeah you have my vote" why not just let me know that you were voting me out? Like HELLO. I don't know why I should vote for a coward, i'm not that scary.

Also, for Will and James, you guys still made it seem like you guys weren't in an alliance even after your goodbye message, it was pretty late in the game you could have let me in on it since Brian already did, yet you even lied to me in your GB messages gosh.


Anyways i love these questions so answer them.

1. Rank each juror, say what they could have done better in the game, and what things they were great at in the game.
2. Why does the other person sitting next to you ABSOLUTELY suck? (be harsh please.)
3. Compare each juror to a survivor contestant, and why

[James Rhine]

Rachel, let me start off by saying that I'm expecting nothing from you. You were the only juror I went out of my way to lie to. And I think you are an amazing player (that I was intimidated by).

I think (since this game was so fucking long) I was getting a little crazy. I felt like I was in an asylum lol. You were the reason I felt what it was like to be on the block. You evicted my partner, and I was pissed! Of course, I'm not going to let you know that, since we still live in the house together. But ever since that week, I was gunning for you HARD. I nominated you when I was HoH in the fast forward week because I wanted you out (I told you that you were a pawn, I was lying again!)

But I do want to say that the reason your partner nominated you was because of me. I convinced Brian it would benefit both of our games if he nominated you, when really it only benefited mine. Your veto streak ended, which sealed your fate. I was in a mean mood that week, in that I wanted to win veto so I wouldn't use it on you (because I told you I would use it on you, I wanted to make it obvious I lied). Since I didn't win veto, I felt the only satisfaction I could get was to tell you I was voting to keep you, and then vote you out. I wanted to give you hope, and then strip it away. Not to mention, I just didn't like you at that stage of the game. Why would I be honest to someone who doesn't have my back?

Also, I believe you and Alex are similar in that I consider you both to take the game personally. I grouped you guys as emotional players. Every pm I got from you Rachel would included something along the lines of "...and it really hurt my feelings tbh." I think you need to mature up a bit and realize at the end of the day, it's just a game. But I do understand where you're coming from, as people you trusted backstabbed you. It's just that the deals I made were worth a bit more than the deals you made.

Here is my goodbye message to you:

Rachel: It was definitely too little too late. You had my word that I had your back until you nominated me. There's no way I could lend help you help just because your friends don't want you here anymore and I'm a last resort. If you would've shown me loyalty earlier, you would not be leaving now. I think you're a fierce competitor. Yes I lied to you, but this is Big Brother, and it's part of the game. Had the roles been switched, I'm pretty confident you would've went after me.

I didn't mention Brian and Will at all. A goodbye message is from me to you. I wanted to give you reasons from my perspective alone why I did what I did. And I felt mentioning my alliance with Will and Brian was unnecessary for your knowledge, just like I felt it was unnecessary for anyone else's. So I don't see how I "lied" to you in my goodbye message...lo. I said "Yes I lied to you" in the message itself!

I do want to to say you're an interesting player. My favorite houseguest to talk about this season is you. I could say more things (good and bad) but it would be tangents. I'll now focus on your 3 questions.

1. Rank each juror, say what they could have done better in the game, and what things they were great at in the game.
1. Michael- I thought he was the most likeable. He was active, yet not threatening. The major thing that screwed him was that power he possessed. He could've made it farther without it.
2. Brian- Deal master. The whole house felt safe with him. I wish he took more risks, but he definitely was playing the entire house.
3. Will- Someone who gave up voting rights and was never nominated should be given credit. Will had ties in the house as well. He just needed to sway his ties each week, and I think he failed to do that the week Ivette won veto.
4. Sharon- I consider Sharon to be in the middle a lot. I also felt myself to be in the middle. It's just that she needs to make sure people that are more threatening AND weaker get eliminated so she can stay in the middle.
5. Rachel- You have competitions down. The thing for you to work on is assessing who's aligned with who. Using your intuition and acting upon it. You can't always trust what people have to say, especially after you've nominated them.
6. James Z.- I never considered James Z. a threat. I think he had a lot of bark with no bite. He needs to stop playing a character of the game, and just play as himself. He would've made it farther if he did.
7. David- TOTAL DISAPPOINTMENT. I wish I got to see/hear more from him. He's done so well in the past, but he just didn't put any time or energy in this cycle, and it showed.
8. Chelsia- Well, she won an HoH so that's good. I've spoken to her the least, and I would say I'm pretty active at communicating. I guess I just found her personally unnecessary for my gameplay.

Why Ivette sucks: FLOATER! She's an ideal person to be sitting next to in the final 2. I'm Natalie, she's Ronnie (from bbrecycledallstars). The only reason she survived was because of how less she put into the game than others. She got so lucky Brian was manipulated by Chima into voting out Michele and Nathan over Ivette and James Z. It was only then that Brian convinced me to vote out Michele and Nathan, making the vote 3-1, rather than 2-2 where Alex and Jordan would've voted out Ivette and James (I know this as Alex and I were close). So as much as she helped me get in the final 2, I'm the reason why her picture was still in color after she returned from her vacation.

I don't watch survivor, I'll do my best as I prob don't remember their names:

Brian- Yul, good combination of alliance and performance.
Chelsia- That bleach blonde chick (Candi? maybe). Just because she's pretty but got voted out early so we never really got to see her. Chelsia made final 4, but I still feel I don't know her.
Will- Richard, doing his own thing (like walking naked on the beach). Don't like it? Leave.
Rachel- Parvati, sometimes her competitions help her. Other times it hurts her.
David- that smoker person, I think he was on the same time with Cirie. He wanted to leave but ended up staying.
Michael- Rupert, good guy playing a dirty game
Sharon- Colleen, sexy girl!
James Z.- Jonny Fairplay, except not as in tune with the manipulation factor.

[Ivette Corredero]

Thanks Rachel I am sorry that I was inactive at times and was kind of useless for you Anyway onto your questions;

1. Rank each juror, say what they could have done better in the game, and what things they were great at in the game.

1. Will

Could of done better; I would say communication because it is possible I could of kept him if he communicated with me that round. Despite that, I can't really think of anything.
Things they were great at; I think he was great at making the right alliances and had great strategy.

2. Brian

Could of done better; I don't know. The only thing I can think of is being better in competitions even tho he is good at competitions as I mention in the next part he was great at them. But that's the only reason why he didn't make the finals. Oh I guess creating bonds earlier in the game cause that was a factor as well.
Things they were great at; Being charming I think he also had great strategy and won his fair share of competitons.


3. Rachel

Could of done better; Formed an alliance or something. You did have individual alliances but maybe forming a 4way could of helped your game.
Things they were great at; I think you were great at competitions. Went on a hat-trick with the Veto !!

4. Michael

Could of done better; Made stronger bonds with others because I feel he could of possibly gotten the votes if his connections were strong despite being threatening.
Things they were great at; Getting things done or influencing. I remember he would have to convince/influence Chima to do moves that he wanted to do, ect.

5. Chelsia

Could of done better; Stronger in competitions because it would of helped her get over the line. Mainly mentally as that was the power of veto that cost her the finals.
Things they were great at; I guess being liked, lol. I've never heard anyone say one bad word about her.


6. Sharon

Could of done better; Socialising because we never talked and I feel that might of been the case for others as well.
Things they were great at; I guess you could say being loyal. She was loyal to James and that is something great because loyalty is such a plus!


7. James Z

Could of done better; Needed to chill out. I think he was likeable at times but other than that, he rubbed people the wrong way by freaking out and just being rude.
Things they were great at; James was great at creating attention, lol.

8. David

Could of done better; Socialising. I know I wasn't a social whore but I never spoke one word to David until the week he was up against Michael. I know he survived that round but if my vote mattered, he certainly wouldn't of had it due to our communication. David sent me a PM asking for my vote but because I was closer to Michael, my vote was a lock.
Things they were great at; I think being a nice guy and funny in general. Once again, great qualities. I don't really know what type of game he played so yeah. I guess great at being under the radar once he returned back to the house. It allowed him to slip pass.

2. Why does the other person sitting next to you ABSOLUTELY suck? (be harsh please.)

I think James sucks because he was liar, sneaky, shady and a backstabber. He told unnecessary lies and seems like a dick since he went out of his way to do so in such situations as the week that you left. Also he sucks because he wasn't in control all the time and had to be saved twice by me. That's all I got I don't like being TOO harsh!!

And just to comment on his thing... Chima manipulated Brian because I was close to Michael and made a deal with Chima. So it's not like I randomly got lucky cuz I campaigned for that

3. Compare each juror to a survivor contestant, and why

I haven't watched much survivor as you know but I'll try my best with reasonings based on what I've read and whatnot.

Will - BRob (S8) - Was in a dominate alliance that had potential to make the finals. Also a strong competitor and had a lot of strategy.
Brian - JT (S18) - JT was likeable, a hardworker and made the right deals just like Brian. JT had a tight relationship with Stephen like Brian did with James.
Rachel - Na'Onka (S21) This is more personal lmao since I know you like this ghetto queen and you aren't afraid to speak your mind. You have similar personalities I heard she likes reddik... or something.
Michael - Aaron (S15) I think Michael was strong and had potential to cause damage. I think he was taken out because of this and Aaron was voted out for being a threat.
Chelsia - Natalie (S19) Underestimated and likeable. I think if Chelsia made F2, she would of won.
Sharon - Sydney (S18) I'm just basing this off them both being nice and not that much of a threat.
James Z - Russell (S19) Well not in terms of gameplay but mainly the persona, lol. Russell wasn't well liked by the cast and it's obvious James Z wasn't either.
David - Tom (S10) I think he tried his best at challenges and was a nice, funny guy.

Thanks again honey M.

[Rachel Reilly]

GURL I do love sum reddik.
Good luck in the end Honey K.

Thanks for the answer James, I am an emotional player, I think it is what makes me a good player, tear at peoples heart strings, unfortunately you were too much of an asshole for it to work on. =(

[James Rhine]

You're welcome!

As a rebuttal to that, the thing I found frustrating was that I genuinely wanted to work with you. I sent you a PM I think right before I became HoH for the first time, saying I respected your gameplay and I think we could work well together. But your emotions led you to believe Will when he told you I was talking mess about you, when in actuality, I talk to will all the time because Will and I were aligned, and me being nominated next to Sharon would protect Brian and Will from the block. Not to mention, it made it seem like Will and I weren't working together the way he threw me under the bus to you.

You're a good competitor, but I think you'll be even better if you follow your instincts and think things through, rather than going off of what you hear and feel